After reading the article
“Researching East Jerusalem,” I asked myself the same question that was asked
to the author- what do I remember most about Jerusalem? The first memory that
came into my head was visiting the Western Wall on Shabbat Friday. Seeing all the Jewish people worshiping
and praying as the sun was setting was the most impactful religious/cultural
experience that has ever occurred to me. This is what I remember most. However,
as I was reading the article I realized that on my trip to Israel I only
experienced the Jewish part of Jerusalem. The first thing I think
about is the part of Jerusalem opposite of the author. Amiry's perspective and memory is completely different from mine.
When Amiry claimed in her interview
that Jerusalem is a city that belongs to other people not just Israeli’s, I quickly
thought about how I viewed Jerusalem. I know that Jerusalem is a city that
contains many religions, however I guess I have always viewed Jerusalem as being a big
part of Israel and Israel’s national identity, I never associated the city as belonging
to others.
I related a lot to Amiry’s point
about how others view Jerusalem as just being a center of religion. Most people
that I talk to about Jerusalem only see it for its rich history and religious
locations- as a tourist center. This is exactly how I used to see it too. However, once I visited I was able
to actually experience what life would have been like if I was a teenager
living in Jerusalem. There is definitely a life outside of religion, such as
Ben Yehuda Street.
With regards to the representation
of Jerusalem at the Smithsonian festival, I believe that considering the
conflict, it would be very difficult to display the city in a way that is
accurate to everyone. Also, I could only imagine the struggle that must have
occurred between both the Israeli’s and Palestinians- they struggle to represent
Jerusalem in Jerusalem so why would it be easier anywhere else? In Galit Hasan’s Dialogueas, he
mentioned the difficulty of being on the Israeli team if he had not experienced
the peace movement.
The idea of having two separate research teams reinforces
that two major ethnic groups/religious groups see Jerusalem as two different
cities. Even though technically Jerusalem can be seen as a united city, in
actuality it is not. It has different identities, different boundaries and
different meanings to everyone but it does not have a common meaning. The
United States of America has different identities and ideologies and meanings
but the people are also united- they are American and are drawn together by the
belief of freedom, for example. Jerusalem is lacking a commonality.
I really liked how you phrased your thoughts on how Jerusalem cannot be seen as a United City and how this is due to lacking a commonality. There is so much keeping Jerusalemites apart and little to draw them together. If two Americans ran into eachother when they were overseas, they would have a common identity to bond them. However, if two Jerusalemites, a Palestinian and an Israeli, met up when they were abroad, I doubt it would be a very pleasant meeting.
ReplyDeleteGood post! :)